Bernstein v. Siegel
This text of 281 A.D. 984 (Bernstein v. Siegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff, who was seventy years of age and receiving social security and unemployment insurance benefits, was standing on the sidewalk when, as a result of a collision between a taxicab and a bus, the taxicab mounted the sidewalk and struck plaintiff. He suffered a fracture of the tibia near the ankle and other injuries, which were minor. The fracture has healed well, although full use of the ankle is reduced permanently. After trial, the jury returned a verdict of $10,000 in favor of plaintiff and against both [985]*985defendants. Defendant City of New York appeals from the judgment entered thereon. Judgment against appellant reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless within ten days after entry of an order hereon plaintiff stipulate to accept a verdict against appellant in the amount of $5,000, in which event the judgment against appellant, as reduced accordingly, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the verdict was excessive. Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 984, 120 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernstein-v-siegel-nyappdiv-1953.