Bernstein v. Red Apple Supermarkets

New York Court of Appeals

Bernstein v. Red Apple Supermarkets

678 N.E.2d 493, 89 N.Y.2d 961, 655 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 158

New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 11, 1997·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the May 21, [962]*9621996 Appellate Division order, dismissed as untimely upon the ground that the prior motion for leave to appeal from the May 21, 1996 order, made to the Appellate Division, was untimely (see, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 101, at 429); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the May 21, [962]*9621996 Appellate Division order, dismissed as untimely upon the ground that the prior motion for leave to appeal from the May 21, 1996 order, made to the Appellate Division, was untimely (see, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 101, at 429); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Bernstein v. Red Apple Supermarkets, 678 N.E.2d 493, 89 N.Y.2d 961, 655 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 158 (N.Y. 1997).

Pincite

678 N.E.2d 493 (Bernstein v. Red Apple Supermarkets) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related