Bernstein v. Midwest Collection Agency
This text of 350 P.2d 827 (Bernstein v. Midwest Collection Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This case involves the question of whether plaintiffs in error were properly held liable by the trial court in a suit against them on an oral contract on an open account for goods sold and delivered. Plaintiffs in error contend that the indebtedness was in fact owed by a corporation which they had purchased. The statute of frauds was not plead as a defense below, hence is not involved here.
We find ample evidence in the record to sustain the finding and judgment of the trial court based upon conflicting evidence.
The judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Moore and Mr. Justice Knauss concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
350 P.2d 827, 142 Colo. 345, 1960 Colo. LEXIS 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernstein-v-midwest-collection-agency-colo-1960.