Bernstein v. Koken Barber's Supply Co.

57 S.E. 1017, 1 Ga. App. 445, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 258
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 11, 1907·No. 197·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hm, O. J.

1. An agency can not be established by proof of the declarations of the alleged agent, though made dum fervet opus.

2. A statement made by an agent as to discounts on sales of goods, given, generally by his principal, is not admissible to contradict the terms oi discount offered by the principal in a particular transaction negotiated, by the principal with the purchaser.

3. There being no error of law complained of, except that covered by the two preceding notes, and the verdict of the jury in the justice’s court having been demanded by the evidence, the judgment of the superior court on certiorari, approving such verdict and refusing to remand the case for another trial is Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernstein v. Koken Barber's Supply Co., 57 S.E. 1017, 1 Ga. App. 445, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 258 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

57 S.E. 1017 (Bernstein v. Koken Barber's Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Lang
39 S.E.2d 418 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Horton v. Tway
158 S.E. 365 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)