Bernstein v. Hakim

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Bernstein v. Hakim

126 Misc. 582, 214 N.Y.S. 82, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 600

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 10, 1926·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appearance of the defendant on the motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint in this action was in substance a special appearance. Moreover, the court below acquired no jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, as the service of the summons and complaint was procured by fraud and deceit on the part of the plaintiff. Judgment and order appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint is granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Delehanty and Wagner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appearance of the defendant on the motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint in this action was in substance a special appearance. Moreover, the court below acquired no jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, as the service of the summons and complaint was procured by fraud and deceit on the part of the plaintiff. Judgment and order appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint is granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Delehanty and Wagner, JJ.

Bernstein v. Hakim, 126 Misc. 582, 214 N.Y.S. 82, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 600 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

126 Misc. 582 (Bernstein v. Hakim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related