Bernstein v. Crowne Princess Club
This text of 267 A.D.2d 174 (Bernstein v. Crowne Princess Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered April 10, 1998, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained at a resort, inter alia, denied defendants-appellants travel agent’s and tour operator’s motions to dismiss the action for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The complaint states a cause of action against appellants for negligence (cf., Passero v DHC Hotels & Resorts, 981 F Supp 742, 744). Whether appellants’ presence at the hotel through the counter was such as to make them aware of the danger, and whether the danger was such as not to be readily discoverable by plaintiff, are issues of fact that cannot be addressed before joinder of issue (CPLR 3212 [a]). Concur — Tom, J. P., Wallach, Lerner, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.D.2d 174, 700 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernstein-v-crowne-princess-club-nyappdiv-1999.