Bernstein v. Common Markets, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bernstein v. Common Markets, Inc.

183 So. 2d 290

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 1, 1966

DocketNo. 65-526

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 183 So. 2d 290 (Bernstein v. Common Markets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bernstein v. Common Markets, Inc., 183 So. 2d 290 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, as plaintiff in the trial court, brought an action in two counts against the appellee. Each count was for salary claimed under an employment contract. The first count alleged a written contract and the second, an oral agreement to employ. A jury trial resulted in a verdict and subsequent judgment for the defendant on both counts.

On this appeal, appellant has failed to demonstrate prejudicial error. The judgment is affirmed upon authority of the rule that an appellate court will not reverse a judgment based on substantial evidence where the record does not reveal that the errors resulted in a miscarriage of justice. Symmes v. Prairie Pebble Phosphate Co., 69 Fla. 4, 67 So. 228 (1915); Victor Hotel Owners v. Sperling, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 120.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, as plaintiff in the trial court, brought an action in two counts against the appellee. Each count was for salary claimed under an employment contract. The first count alleged a written contract and the second, an oral agreement to employ. A jury trial resulted in a verdict and subsequent judgment for the defendant on both counts.

On this appeal, appellant has failed to demonstrate prejudicial error. The judgment is affirmed upon authority of the rule that an appellate court will not reverse a judgment based on substantial evidence where the record does not reveal that the errors resulted in a miscarriage of justice. Symmes v. Prairie Pebble Phosphate Co., 69 Fla. 4, 67 So. 228 (1915); Victor Hotel Owners v. Sperling, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 120.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 So. 2d 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernstein-v-common-markets-inc-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack