Bernstein v. Clark
This text of 13 S.E. 336 (Bernstein v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From the judgment of a justice of the peace, rendered in a suit upon an account for less than fifty dollara, there being issues of fact involved, a certiorari will not lie, hut there should he an appeal to a jury in the justice’s court. Thompson v. Dodd Bros., 84 Ga. 264 ; Greenwood v. Boyd & Baxter Furniture Factory, 86 Ga. 582. Judgment reversed.
Bernstein sued Clark on an account for $18.25, as to the correctness of which issue was taken at the trial, [149]*149both parties introducing evidence. 'After judgment by the magistrate for the plaintiff, -the defendant by certiorari assigned erroP upon certain legal points which were decided against him, and upon the judgment as contrary to evidence. The superior court overruled a motion to dismiss the certiorari, made upon the ground that appeal to a jury in the justice’s court had not first been taken ; and sustained the certiorari upon a legal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 S.E. 336, 87 Ga. 148, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernstein-v-clark-ga-1891.