Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Bernstein v. City of Vidalia

Bernstein v. City of Vidalia

141 S.E. 432, 165 Ga. 491, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 17
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 12, 1928
DocketNos. 6087-6092
StatusPublished

This text of 141 S.E. 432 (Bernstein v. City of Vidalia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bernstein v. City of Vidalia, 141 S.E. 432, 165 Ga. 491, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 17 (Ga. 1928).

Opinions

Hill, J.

Upon conflicting evidence the judge did not abuse bis discretion in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Saffold & Sharpe, for plaintiffs. D. O. Pattillo and B. P. Jackson, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. Oakland City
59 S.E. 296 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Starnes v. City of Atlanta
77 S.E. 381 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 S.E. 432, 165 Ga. 491, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernstein-v-city-of-vidalia-ga-1928.