Bernstein v. Bernstein

122 A.D.2d 96, 504 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59165
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1986·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action, the husband appeals from a purported order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berkowitz, J.), entered October 25, 1985, which denied his motion for an order granting him possession and ownership of the marital premises.

Appeal from the purported order dismissed (see, CPLR 2219, 5512 [a]).

Special Term did not sign an order in appealable form. Hence, no appeal lies to this court. Even if the order were in proper form, the absence of minutes makes it impossible for this court to pass upon the correctness of Special Term’s ruling. Consequently, if the appellant wishes to pursue this [97]*97matter, it will be necessary for him to make a new application for the desired relief at Special Term. Niehoff, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernstein v. Bernstein, 122 A.D.2d 96, 504 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

122 A.D.2d 96 (Bernstein v. Bernstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DiSanto v. DiSanto
29 A.D.3d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
O'Fennell Corp. v. O'Fennell's of Pine Hill, Inc.
188 A.D.2d 981 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)