Bernstein v. Bernstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bernstein v. Bernstein

3 A.D.2d 857, 163 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5774

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 857 (Bernstein v. Bernstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bernstein v. Bernstein, 3 A.D.2d 857, 163 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, Family Court Division, Kings County, made after trial, directing appellant to pay $85 a month for the support of respondent on “means basis”. Appellant’s principal contention is that the Domestic Relations Court lacked jurisdiction because the marriage of the parties had bees [858]*858dissolved by a Florida decree of divorce, obtained by him in 1938. The Domestic Relations Court found that appellant’s “ residence ” in Florida was insufficient to establish the requisite change of his domicile so as to accord jurisdiction to the Florida tribunal. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, Family Court Division, Kings County, made after trial, directing appellant to pay $85 a month for the support of respondent on “means basis”. Appellant’s principal contention is that the Domestic Relations Court lacked jurisdiction because the marriage of the parties had bees [858]*858dissolved by a Florida decree of divorce, obtained by him in 1938. The Domestic Relations Court found that appellant’s “ residence ” in Florida was insufficient to establish the requisite change of his domicile so as to accord jurisdiction to the Florida tribunal. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 857, 163 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernstein-v-bernstein-nyappdiv-1957.