Bernstein v. Bernstein
This text of 214 A.D. 790 (Bernstein v. Bernstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed upon the law, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff for the forfeiture of defendant’s lease and for the recovery by plaintiff of possession of the premises. We think there was a deliberate and willful violation by defendant of the condition and covenant contained in the lease against placing signs upon the building in question. (Plumb v. Tubbs, 41 N. Y. 442; Munro v. Syracuse, etc., R. R. Co., 200 id. 224; Southwick v. N. Y. Christian Missionary Society, 151 App. Div. 116; Rose v. Hawley, 141 N. Y. 366, 374.) Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur; Kelly, P. J., and Kapper, J., dissent, and vote to affirm on the opinion of Mr. Justice Carswell at Trial Term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 A.D. 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernstein-v-bernstein-nyappdiv-1925.