Bernstein v. Bear Lithia Springs Water Co.
This text of 90 N.Y.S. 1061 (Bernstein v. Bear Lithia Springs Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was sufficient testimony presented on the part of the plaintiff herein to warrant its submission and a decision of the case upon the merits. This view was concededly taken by the trial court at the close of the trial, as he denied defendant’s motion for a dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint, but subsequently rendered a judgment dismissing the complaint. Therein he was in error. It does not appear that the dismissal was upon the merits, and we are forced to the conclusion that it was for insufficiency of proof. A nonsuit. Place v. Hayward, 117 N. Y. 487, 23 N. E. 25; Schlesinger v. Jud, 61 App. Div. 453, 70 N. Y. Supp. 616.
Judgment reversed. New trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 N.Y.S. 1061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernstein-v-bear-lithia-springs-water-co-nyappterm-1904.