Bernstein v. Bear Lithia Springs Water Co.

90 N.Y.S. 1061
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 7, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 1061 (Bernstein v. Bear Lithia Springs Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bernstein v. Bear Lithia Springs Water Co., 90 N.Y.S. 1061 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

There was sufficient testimony presented on the part of the plaintiff herein to warrant its submission and a decision of the case upon the merits. This view was concededly taken by the trial court at the close of the trial, as he denied defendant’s motion for a dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint, but subsequently rendered a judgment dismissing the complaint. Therein he was in error. It does not appear that the dismissal was upon the merits, and we are forced to the conclusion that it was for insufficiency of proof. A nonsuit. Place v. Hayward, 117 N. Y. 487, 23 N. E. 25; Schlesinger v. Jud, 61 App. Div. 453, 70 N. Y. Supp. 616.

Judgment reversed. New trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Place v. . Hayward
23 N.E. 25 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Schlesinger v. Jud
61 A.D. 453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 N.Y.S. 1061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernstein-v-bear-lithia-springs-water-co-nyappterm-1904.