Bernie J.E. Dingle v. Parker Evatt

Fourth Circuit

Bernie J.E. Dingle v. Parker Evatt

21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15907, 1994 WL 129828

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 14, 1994

Docket93-7106

StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 422 (Bernie J.E. Dingle v. Parker Evatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bernie J.E. Dingle v. Parker Evatt, 21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15907, 1994 WL 129828 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Bernie J.E. DINGLE, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT, Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-7106.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 29, 1994.
Decided April 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-91-1751-3-BC)

Bernie J.E. Dingle, appellant pro se.

Barbara Murcier Bowens, S.C. Dept. of Corrections, Columbia, SC, for appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) claim. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dingle v. Evatt, No. CA-91-1751-3-BC (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Bernie J.E. DINGLE, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT, Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-7106.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 29, 1994.
Decided April 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-91-1751-3-BC)

Bernie J.E. Dingle, appellant pro se.

Barbara Murcier Bowens, S.C. Dept. of Corrections, Columbia, SC, for appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) claim. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dingle v. Evatt, No. CA-91-1751-3-BC (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15907, 1994 WL 129828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernie-je-dingle-v-parker-evatt-ca4-1994.