Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Bernick v. Cigna Corp.

Bernick v. Cigna Corp.

112 A.D.2d 45, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50693
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 4, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 112 A.D.2d 45 (Bernick v. Cigna Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bernick v. Cigna Corp., 112 A.D.2d 45, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), (7) should have been granted. Plaintiff failed to show that the activities of defendant, the parent corporation of plaintiff’s employer, sufficiently dominated the employer to make the parent a proper defendant (Musman v Modern Deb, 50 AD2d 761). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fay Estates v. Toys "R" Us, Inc.
22 A.D.3d 712 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Lorkowski v. J.C. Pitman Co.
177 A.D.2d 1021 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Computersearch Corp. v. ECL Industries, Inc.
142 A.D.2d 961 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A.D.2d 45, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernick-v-cigna-corp-nyappdiv-1985.