Bernice M. Gordon and Phillip M. Matthews v. Gladys Lloyd Matthews

D.C. Circuit

Bernice M. Gordon and Phillip M. Matthews v. Gladys Lloyd Matthews

248 F.2d 660, 101 U.S. App. D.C. 338

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 17, 1957

Docket13795

StatusPublished

This text of 248 F.2d 660 (Bernice M. Gordon and Phillip M. Matthews v. Gladys Lloyd Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bernice M. Gordon and Phillip M. Matthews v. Gladys Lloyd Matthews, 248 F.2d 660, 101 U.S. App. D.C. 338 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint filed to remove a duly appointed conservator. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

An examination of the record discloses that the District Court has carefully scrutinized all requests for allowances and expenditures, and there is no reason to assume that such will not continue to be the case in the future conduct of the conservatorship.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint filed to remove a duly appointed conservator. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

An examination of the record discloses that the District Court has carefully scrutinized all requests for allowances and expenditures, and there is no reason to assume that such will not continue to be the case in the future conduct of the conservatorship.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 F.2d 660, 101 U.S. App. D.C. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernice-m-gordon-and-phillip-m-matthews-v-gladys-lloyd-matthews-cadc-1957.