Bernheimer v. Verdon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Bernheimer v. Verdon

49 A. 732, 63 N.J. Eq. 312, 18 Dickinson 312, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 184

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJune 19, 1901

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A. 732 (Bernheimer v. Verdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bernheimer v. Verdon, 49 A. 732, 63 N.J. Eq. 312, 18 Dickinson 312, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 184 (N.J. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from by both sides in this ease is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery, except that the date of January 31st, 1900, stated by mistake in the decree, should be changed to January 31st, 1899.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Sycicel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—15. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from by both sides in this ease is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery, except that the date of January 31st, 1900, stated by mistake in the decree, should be changed to January 31st, 1899.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Sycicel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—15. For reversal—None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A. 732, 63 N.J. Eq. 312, 18 Dickinson 312, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernheimer-v-verdon-nj-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack