Bernhardt v. HOWE-BERNHARDT
224 S.W.3d 50, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 355, 2007 WL 654238
Opinion
ORDER
Mary Howe-Bernhardt appeals from the judgment dissolving her marriage to Daniel Bernhardt. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, that no error of law appears, and that the court did not abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bernhardt v. HOWE-BERNHARDT, 224 S.W.3d 50, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 355, 2007 WL 654238 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
224 S.W.3d 50 (Bernhardt v. HOWE-BERNHARDT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. Marcin, Inc.
224 S.W.3d 50 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)