Bernhard v. Irwin

79 N.E.2d 787, 50 Ohio Law. Abs. 288, 1947 Ohio App. LEXIS 760
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided September 12, 1947·No. No. 1885·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of appellees to dismiss the appeal on questions of law and fact because the judgment appealed from was not entered in a chancery case.

The motion is well taken and will be sustained. The action below to remove an administrator is statutory: Sec. 10596-53 GG. The cause therefore proceeded in the trial court as at law. Nordin v Colton, 142 Oh St 277.

It is now determined that the cause may not be tried upon the facts and it will be held as an appeal on questions of law. A Bill of Exceptions having been filed in this court, no order is required with respect thereto.

MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur. WISEMAN, PJ, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernhard v. Irwin, 79 N.E.2d 787, 50 Ohio Law. Abs. 288, 1947 Ohio App. LEXIS 760 (Ohio Ct. App. 1947).

79 N.E.2d 787 (Bernhard v. Irwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Anders
162 N.E.2d 871 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1959)
In re Trust, Thomas
97 N.E.2d 36 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1949)