Bernhard v. Gaffney
243 F.2d 41, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 97
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 1957
DocketNo. 13263
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 243 F.2d 41 (Bernhard v. Gaffney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bernhard v. Gaffney, 243 F.2d 41, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 97 (D.C. Cir. 1957).
Opinion
This is a suit to recover damages for the alleged malpractice of a surgeon. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the District Court directed a verdict for the defendant. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ruth Lohr v. Lawrence Tittle
275 F.2d 662 (Tenth Circuit, 1960)
Arthur Theodore Bernhard v. Dr. Leo B. Gaffney
243 F.2d 41 (D.C. Circuit, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
243 F.2d 41, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernhard-v-gaffney-cadc-1957.