Bernhard v. Gaffney
243 F.2d 41, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 97
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 28, 1957·No. No. 13263·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
This is a suit to recover damages for the alleged malpractice of a surgeon. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the District Court directed a verdict for the defendant. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bernhard v. Gaffney, 243 F.2d 41, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 97 (D.C. Cir. 1957).
243 F.2d 41 (Bernhard v. Gaffney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ruth Lohr v. Lawrence Tittle
275 F.2d 662 (Tenth Circuit, 1960)
Arthur Theodore Bernhard v. Dr. Leo B. Gaffney
243 F.2d 41 (D.C. Circuit, 1957)