Bernhard v. Estate of McMaster

10 N.Y. St. Rep. 35
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 18, 1887
StatusPublished

This text of 10 N.Y. St. Rep. 35 (Bernhard v. Estate of McMaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bernhard v. Estate of McMaster, 10 N.Y. St. Rep. 35 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the authority of the Architectural Iron Works v. The City of Brooklyn, (85 N. Y., 652), when [36]*36the security requisite to make an appeal effectual, has not by some oversight been given, and where such neglect shall be. deemed excusable, the court has the power to permit the omission to be supplied.

In the case at bar the appellant should be allowed to file the undertaking required by section 2577 of the Code, which is requisite to make the appeal effectual, within five days from the service of a copy of the order entered upon the decision of this motion, or the appeal should be dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Architectural Iron Works v. . City of Brooklyn
85 N.Y. 652 (New York Court of Appeals, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 N.Y. St. Rep. 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernhard-v-estate-of-mcmaster-nysupct-1887.