Bernhard v. Allen
14 A. 42, 10 Sadler 274, 22 Week. No. 67, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 962
Opinion
The plaintiffs claim by virtue of a treasurer’s sale of the land as unseated. The treasurer’s deed so describes it. To render a treasurer’s sale of unseated land valid, it must have been assessed as unseated. McReynolds v. Longenberger, 57 Pa. 13.
It was essential for the plaintiffs to prove this fact before they could recover. This they did not do nor would any of the evidence excluded have raised such a presumption had it been admitted. The plaintiffs did not make out a prima facie case; hence it was not error to enter a nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bernhard v. Allen, 14 A. 42, 10 Sadler 274, 22 Week. No. 67, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 962 (Pa. 1888).
14 A. 42 (Bernhard v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Untitled Case
D. Nevada, 2026
(PS) Warnken v. County of Solano
E.D. California, 2025
Solis v. City of Sunnyvale
N.D. California, 2020
(PC) Struggs v. Pfeiffer
E.D. California, 2019
South-Suburban Housing Center, Cross-Appellant v. Greater South Suburban Board of Realtors and National Association of Realtors, Counterplaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees v. City of Blue Island, Counterdefendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants
935 F.2d 868 (Seventh Circuit, 1991)
South-Suburban Housing Center v. Greater South Suburban Board of Realtors
935 F.2d 868 (Seventh Circuit, 1991)
Lopez v. Louisiana National Guard
733 F. Supp. 1059 (E.D. Louisiana, 1990)