Bernhard Ulmann Co. v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 440, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1811
United States Customs Court·Decided April 21, 1949·No. No. 7698; Entry No. 722181, etc.·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues relating to the appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and ma.de a part hereof, are the same in all material respects as those decided in C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States, 21 Cust. Ct. 314, Reap. Dec. 7624, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of the merchandise covered by said appeals, and that such values are the appraised values less additions made by importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernhard Ulmann Co. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 440, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1811 (cusc 1949).

22 Cust. Ct. 440 (Bernhard Ulmann Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States
21 Cust. Ct. 314 (U.S. Customs Court, 1948)