Bernhard Ulmann Co. v. Central Union Trust Co.

178 N.E. 796, 257 N.Y. 563, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 944
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 20, 1931·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Trial Term reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the authority of Strang v. Westchester County Nat. Bank (235 N. Y. 68) and United Cigar Stores Co. v. American Raw Silk Co. (184 App. Div. 217; 229 N. Y. 532), the case of Hartford v. Greenwich Bank (157 App. Div. 448; 215 N. Y. 726) being so inconsistent in principle with the cases cited that it must now be overruled; no opinion.

Concur: Cakdozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernhard Ulmann Co. v. Central Union Trust Co., 178 N.E. 796, 257 N.Y. 563, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 944 (N.Y. 1931).

178 N.E. 796 (Bernhard Ulmann Co. v. Central Union Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Segal v. National City Bank
183 Misc. 994 (New York Supreme Court, 1944)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Union Trust Co.
37 F. Supp. 3 (W.D. New York, 1941)
Cohen v. Lincoln Savings Bank
10 N.E.2d 457 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.
1 Cal. App. 2d 694 (California Court of Appeal, 1934)
American Surety Co. v. Empire Trust Co.
186 N.E. 436 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)
Daniels v. Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co.
144 Misc. 163 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1932)