Bernhard Ulmann Co. v. Central Union Trust Co.
This text of 178 N.E. 796 (Bernhard Ulmann Co. v. Central Union Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Trial Term reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the authority of Strang v. Westchester County Nat. Bank (235 N. Y. 68) and United Cigar Stores Co. v. American Raw Silk Co. (184 App. Div. 217; 229 N. Y. 532), the case of Hartford v. Greenwich Bank (157 App. Div. 448; 215 N. Y. 726) being so inconsistent in principle with the cases cited that it must now be overruled; no opinion.
Concur: Cakdozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 N.E. 796, 257 N.Y. 563, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernhard-ulmann-co-v-central-union-trust-co-ny-1931.