Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican

924 A.2d 137, 282 Conn. 912, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 213
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 1, 2007·No. SC 17899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 100 Conn. App. 63 (AC 27465), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a prejudgment remedy application is not a civil action for purposes of a subsequent claim for the tort of vexatious litigation?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican, 924 A.2d 137, 282 Conn. 912, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 213 (Colo. 2007).

924 A.2d 137 (Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican
944 A.2d 329 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)