Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican
924 A.2d 137, 282 Conn. 912, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 213
This text of 924 A.2d 137 (Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican, 924 A.2d 137, 282 Conn. 912, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 213 (Colo. 2007).
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 100 Conn. App. 63 (AC 27465), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a prejudgment remedy application is not a civil action for purposes of a subsequent claim for the tort of vexatious litigation?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican
944 A.2d 329 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
924 A.2d 137, 282 Conn. 912, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernhard-thomas-building-systems-llc-v-dunican-conn-2007.