Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican
924 A.2d 137, 282 Conn. 912, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 213
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 100 Conn. App. 63 (AC 27465), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a prejudgment remedy application is not a civil action for purposes of a subsequent claim for the tort of vexatious litigation?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican, 924 A.2d 137, 282 Conn. 912, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 213 (Colo. 2007).
924 A.2d 137 (Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican
944 A.2d 329 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)