Berney v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berney v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

55 A.D.2d 924, 390 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10173

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 924 (Berney v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berney v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp., 55 A.D.2d 924, 390 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action against insurers on a bond and on a policy of insurance, in which a third-party action based upon subrogation was commenced, the third-party defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 5, 1975, as granted the third-party plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the question of liability against third-party defendant Nathan L. Brodie. The appeal also brings up for review so much of a further order of the same court, dated December 4, 1975, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. (By order of this court dated October 29, 1976, an appeal by defendant Aetna Insurance Company from portions of the order of November 5, 1975 was deemed withdrawn.) Appeal by third-party defendant Sarah D. Brodie dismissed. She was not aggrieved by the orders under review. Appeal from portions of the order of November 5, 1975, dismissed as academic. Those portions were superseded by the order made upon reargument. Order of December 4, 1975, affirmed insofar as reviewed. The third-party plaintiff is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements against third-party defendant Nathan L. Brodie. The uncontroverted admission of the third-party defendant that he removed or caused to be removed items from the house [925]*925imposes at least some liability. The extent of the damage caused thereby can be determined when damages are assessed. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action against insurers on a bond and on a policy of insurance, in which a third-party action based upon subrogation was commenced, the third-party defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 5, 1975, as granted the third-party plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the question of liability against third-party defendant Nathan L. Brodie. The appeal also brings up for review so much of a further order of the same court, dated December 4, 1975, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. (By order of this court dated October 29, 1976, an appeal by defendant Aetna Insurance Company from portions of the order of November 5, 1975 was deemed withdrawn.) Appeal by third-party defendant Sarah D. Brodie dismissed. She was not aggrieved by the orders under review. Appeal from portions of the order of November 5, 1975, dismissed as academic. Those portions were superseded by the order made upon reargument. Order of December 4, 1975, affirmed insofar as reviewed. The third-party plaintiff is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements against third-party defendant Nathan L. Brodie. The uncontroverted admission of the third-party defendant that he removed or caused to be removed items from the house [925]*925imposes at least some liability. The extent of the damage caused thereby can be determined when damages are assessed. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 924, 390 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berney-v-general-accident-fire-life-assurance-corp-nyappdiv-1977.