Berner,et al v. Montour ZHB,et al Pet: Sponenberg

190 A.3d 593
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 1, 2018·No. 84 MAL 2018 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 1 st day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to Petitioner's first issue is stated as follows:

(1) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred by holding that the Nutrient Management Act ("NMA"), 3 P.S., § 519, only preempts local ordinances as applied to farms that have an approved nutrient management plan and that small farms that are not required to submit nutrient management plans can be subjected to more stringent regulation than larger more intensive agricultural operations that are required to obtain approval of a nutrient management plan under the Nutrient Management Act.
Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues.

The ancillary applications for Leave to File Amicus Briefs filed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of Attorney General, the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau and the PennAg Industries Association are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berner,et al v. Montour ZHB,et al Pet: Sponenberg, 190 A.3d 593 (Pa. 2018).

190 A.3d 593 (Berner,et al v. Montour ZHB,et al Pet: Sponenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Berner,et al v. Montour ZHB,et al Apl: Sponenberg
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2019