Bernel v. Korobkova

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 16, 2021·No. 7:21-cv-05106·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ALLEN BERNEL, Plaintiff, -against- 7:21-CV-5106 (KMK) YELENA KOROBOVA, Facility Health Service Director; NURSE (JOHN DOE); NURSE ORDER OF SERVICE PRACTICE (JOHN DOE); DIANNE HINTON, Facility’s Nurse Administrator 1; DSA KORM; WILLIAM F. KEYSER, Superintendent, Defendants. KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, currently incarcerated in the Sullivan Correctional Facility (“Sullivan”), brings this pro se action alleging that the defendants have violated his federal constitutional rights. He seeks damages and injunctive relief. Plaintiff sues: (1) Yelena Korobkova, Sullivan’s Facility Health Service Director; (2) “Nurse (John Doe),” an unidentified Sullivan nurse; (3) “Nurse Practice (John Doe),” an unidentified Sullivan nurse practitioner; (4) Dianne Hinton, Sullivan’s Facility Nurse Administrator; (5) William F. Keyser, Sullivan’s Superintendent; and (6) J. Krom, Sullivan’s Deputy Superintendent in charge of administration. The Court construes Plaintiff’s complaint as asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated August 13, 2021, the court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis (“IFP”).1

1 Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee, even when they have been granted permission to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The Court directs service on the identified defendants. The Court also directs the Attorney General of the State of New York to provide Plaintiff and the Court with the identities and service addresses of the unidentified defendants. DISCUSSION A. Service on the identified defendants Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the

Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP). Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that the summons and complaint be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served summonses and the complaint on the identified defendants until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued for those defendants. The Court therefore extends the time to serve the identified defendants with the complaint until 90 days after the date that summonses are issued for those defendants. If the complaint is not served on the identified defendants within

that time, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service); see also Murray v. Pataki, 378 F. App’x 50, 52 (2d Cir. 2010) (summary order) (“As long as the [plaintiff proceeding IFP] provides the information necessary to identify the defendant, the Marshals’ failure to effect service automatically constitutes ‘good cause’ for an extension of time within the meaning of Rule 4(m).”). To allow Plaintiff to effect service of the complaint on the identified defendants through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return forms (“USM-285 form”) for those defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses for the identified defendants and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service of the summonses and the complaint on those defendants. Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may

dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. B. Unidentified defendants Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the complaint, Plaintiff supplies sufficient information to permit the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DOCCS”) to identify the unidentified defendants. The unidentified defendants in this Action are the nurse and nurse practitioner employed at the Sullivan Correctional Facility who examined and treated Plaintiff on September 17 and 18, 2020, in the Sullivan Correctional Facility’s clinic. It is therefore ordered that the Attorney General of the State of New York, who is the attorney for and agent of DOCCS, must ascertain the identities of the unidentified

defendants whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here and the addresses where those defendants may be served. The Attorney General must provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within 60 days of the date of this order. Within 30 days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint in which he names as defendants those newly identified individuals. The amended complaint will replace, not supplement, the original complaint. An amended complaint form that Plaintiff should complete is attached to this order. Once Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, the Court will screen it and, if necessary, issue an order directing service on the newly identified defendants. CONCLUSION The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. The Court also directs the Clerk of Court to: (1) issue summonses for the identified defendants; (2) complete USM-285 forms with the service addresses for those defendants; and (3) deliver all documents necessary to effect service of summonses and the complaint on those defendants to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Court further directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order and a copy of the complaint to the Attorney General of the State of New York at 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10005. The Attorney General must provide to Plaintiff and the Court, within 60 days of the date of this order, the identities and service addresses of the unidentified defendants. An amended complaint form is attached to this order. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 16, 2021 iy White Plains, New York hh KENNETH KARAS) United States District Judge

DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES

Yelena Korobkova Facility Health Service Director Sullivan Correctional Facility 325 Riverside Drive P.O. Box 116 Fallsburg, New York 12733-0116

Dianne Hinton Facility Nurse Administrator Sullivan Correctional Facility 325 Riverside Drive P.O. Box 116 Fallsburg, New York 12733-0116 William F. Keyser Superintendent Sullivan Correctional Facility 325 Riverside Drive P.O. Box 116 Fallsburg, New York 12733-0116

J. Krom Deputy Superintendent Sullivan Correctional Facility 325 Riverside Drive P.O. Box 116 Fallsburg, New York 12733-0116 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CVE Write the full name of each plaintiff. (Include case number if one has been assigned)

“against- COMPLAINT (Prisoner) Do you want a jury trial? ssssssss...0.0.0. L1Yes LINo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernel v. Korobkova, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Bernel v. Korobkova (Bernel v. Korobkova) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murray v. Pataki
378 F. App'x 50 (Second Circuit, 2010)
Meilleur v. Strong
682 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)