Berne v. Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles

Supreme Court of Florida

Berne v. Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles

84 So. 3d 257, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 161, 2012 WL 739100, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 484

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 8, 2012

DocketNo. SC10-2460

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 So. 3d 257 (Berne v. Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berne v. Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 84 So. 3d 257, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 161, 2012 WL 739100, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 484 (Fla. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Berne, 49 So.3d 779 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), review granted, 65 So.3d 515 (Fla.2011) (table), on the basis that the decision of the district court expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of this Court and the decision of another district court of appeal. After further, full consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss this case.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA and PERRY, JJ., concur. CANADY, C.J., PARIENTE, and POLSTON, JJ., concur in result. LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Berne, 49 So.3d 779 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), review granted, 65 So.3d 515 (Fla.2011) (table), on the basis that the decision of the district court expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of this Court and the decision of another district court of appeal. After further, full consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss this case.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA and PERRY, JJ., concur. CANADY, C.J., PARIENTE, and POLSTON, JJ., concur in result. LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 So. 3d 257, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 161, 2012 WL 739100, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berne-v-florida-department-of-highway-safety-motor-vehicles-fla-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack