Berndt v. Gould
This text of 175 A.D. 968 (Berndt v. Gould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Per curiam: We do not deem it necessary to lay down any general rule with reference to granting of bills of particulars requiring the defendant to specify the particular acts of plaintiff’s contributory negligence. Each case should be determined upon its own peculiar circumstances. We are of the opinion that under the facts and circumstances of this case the order should not have been granted. (See Nealon v. South Buffalo Railway Co., 155 App. Div. 880.) All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 A.D. 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berndt-v-gould-nyappdiv-1916.