Bernat v. ECHO SOC'Y OF NIAGARA FALLS, NY
This text of 165 N.E.2d 428 (Bernat v. ECHO SOC'Y OF NIAGARA FALLS, NY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William J. Bernat et al., Appellants,
v.
Echo Society of Niagara Falls, N. Y., Incorporated, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Ira M. J. Hovey and Abraham R. Kushner for appellants.
Sigismund M. Lopacki for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The court erred in dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs' case since questions of fact were presented (1) as to whether plaintiffs had adverse possession of the land in dispute under a claim of title, and (2) as to whether they were entitled to "tack" their possession onto that of their predecessors in order to establish an adverse holding for the requisite statutory period. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 40; see, also, Belotti v. Bickhardt, 228 N.Y. 296, 302, 306; Barnes v. Light, 116 N.Y. 34, 37, 39.) No opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 N.E.2d 428, 7 N.Y.2d 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernat-v-echo-socy-of-niagara-falls-ny-ny-1960.