Bernas v. Simmons

District Court, W.D. Louisiana·Decided September 18, 2025·No. 5:25-cv-00208·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

KENNETH DEAN BERNAS #211368 CASE NO. 5:25-CV-00208 SEC P VERSUS JUDGE TERRY A. DOUGHTY G SIMMONS MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY

JUDGMENT After considering the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 25], noting Plaintiff, Kenneth Bernas, has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation by the deadline, and after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 21] is GRANTED, and all of Plaintiff Kenneth Dean Bernas’ claims against Defendant, Officer Simmons, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from being re-asserted, until Plaintiff meets the conditions set forth in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 18th day of September 2025. ba al sats ‘ec A. Dough 7 Unrated States District Judge

Page 1 of 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernas v. Simmons, (W.D. La. 2025).

Bernas v. Simmons (Bernas v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)