Bernartita Moses v. Jefferson Sessions

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 13, 2018
Docket15-72051
StatusUnpublished

This text of Bernartita Moses v. Jefferson Sessions (Bernartita Moses v. Jefferson Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bernartita Moses v. Jefferson Sessions, (9th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 13 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BERNARTITA MOSES, AKA Bernartita No. 15-72051 Mariano Moses, Agency No. A206-352-760 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 10, 2018**

Before: CANBY, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Bernartita Moses, a native and citizen of the Federated States of Micronesia,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision ordering her removed. Our

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part

the petition for review.

Moses has not raised, and therefore she has waived, any challenge to the

agency’s determination that her conviction under Hawaii Penal Code §§ 708-

830(2), 708-831(1)(b) is a crime involving moral turpitude. See Corro-Barragan v.

Holder, 718 F.3d 1174, 1177 n.5 (9th Cir. 2013) (failure to contest issue in opening

brief resulted in waiver). Moses also waived any challenge to removability,

because she did not raise this contention in her opening brief. See id.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Moses’s unexhausted challenges to the

validity of her criminal conviction. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th

Cir. 2010) (the court lacks jurisdiction to consider legal claims not presented in an

alien’s administrative proceedings before the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

2 15-72051

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tijani v. Holder
628 F.3d 1071 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Elisned Corro-Barragan v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
718 F.3d 1174 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bernartita Moses v. Jefferson Sessions, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernartita-moses-v-jefferson-sessions-ca9-2018.