Bernardi v. Romeo
This text of 83 A.D.2d 985 (Bernardi v. Romeo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm Special Term and note that although we held in Matter of Bertan v O’Neill (83 AD2d 984) that the officers of the Onondaga County Conservative Party were not duly elected at the June 17 meeting, the record does not disclose that the Executive Committee of the Onondaga County Conservative Party was not otherwise validly constituted. Since the burden of showing such infirmity is on petitioner and the record before us fails to disclose it, there is no reason to invalidate its designations. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court, Tenney, J. — election law.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Callahan, Denman and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 A.D.2d 985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernardi-v-romeo-nyappdiv-1981.