Bernard W. Lancaster v. United States

293 F.2d 519, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 331, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4200
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 15, 1961·No. 16229_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2421, and possessing obscene pictures with intent to exhibit them. D.C.Code (1951) § 22-2001. When an alleged obscene film was shown in court, the public except newspaper reporters were excluded. There was other evidence. Appellant’s right to a public trial was not denied. Gillars v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 16, 31, 182 F.2d 962, 977; Iva Ikuko Toguri D’Aguino v. United States, 9 Cir., 192 F.2d 338, 365, certiorari denied, 343 U.S. 935, 72 S.Ct. 772, 96 L.Ed. 1343, rehearing denied, 345 U.S. 931, 72 S.Ct. 1053, 96 L.Ed. 1358.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernard W. Lancaster v. United States, 293 F.2d 519, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 331, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4200 (D.C. Cir. 1961).

293 F.2d 519 (Bernard W. Lancaster v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Latimore
342 N.E.2d 209 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
People v. Hinton
286 N.E.2d 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)