Bernard W. Lancaster v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Bernard W. Lancaster v. United States

293 F.2d 519, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 331, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4200

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 15, 1961

Docket16229_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 293 F.2d 519 (Bernard W. Lancaster v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bernard W. Lancaster v. United States, 293 F.2d 519, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 331, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4200 (D.C. Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2421, and possessing obscene pictures with intent to exhibit them. D.C.Code (1951) § 22-2001. When an alleged obscene film was shown in court, the public except newspaper reporters were excluded. There was other evidence. Appellant’s right to a public trial was not denied. Gillars v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 16, 31, 182 F.2d 962, 977; Iva Ikuko Toguri D’Aguino v. United States, 9 Cir., 192 F.2d 338, 365, certiorari denied, 343 U.S. 935, 72 S.Ct. 772, 96 L.Ed. 1343, rehearing denied, 345 U.S. 931, 72 S.Ct. 1053, 96 L.Ed. 1358.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2421, and possessing obscene pictures with intent to exhibit them. D.C.Code (1951) § 22-2001. When an alleged obscene film was shown in court, the public except newspaper reporters were excluded. There was other evidence. Appellant’s right to a public trial was not denied. Gillars v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 16, 31, 182 F.2d 962, 977; Iva Ikuko Toguri D’Aguino v. United States, 9 Cir., 192 F.2d 338, 365, certiorari denied, 343 U.S. 935, 72 S.Ct. 772, 96 L.Ed. 1343, rehearing denied, 345 U.S. 931, 72 S.Ct. 1053, 96 L.Ed. 1358.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 F.2d 519, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 331, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernard-w-lancaster-v-united-states-cadc-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack