Bernard v. THIGPEN CONST. CO.

702 So. 2d 1387
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 21, 1997
Docket97-C-1877, 97-C-1893 and 97-C-1894
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 702 So. 2d 1387 (Bernard v. THIGPEN CONST. CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bernard v. THIGPEN CONST. CO., 702 So. 2d 1387 (La. 1997).

Opinion

702 So.2d 1387 (1997)

Mona BERNARD, Wife of/and Larry Bernard, et al.
v.
THIGPEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, et al.

Nos. 97-C-1877, 97-C-1893 and 97-C-1894.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 21, 1997.

PER CURIAM.

The rulings of the lower courts are vacated and set aside. In Kenneth E. Ford, et al. v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc., et al., 96-2913, ___ So.2d ___ (La. 9/9/97), this court held that under certain circumstances, the existence of individual causation and liability issues as to each potential class member may so predominate over common issues that class certification is inappropriate. The trial court in this case erred in refusing to allow the introduction by defendants of evidence of causation. The certification of the class is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the trial court to conduct a new class certification hearing in light of this court's holding in Kenneth E. Ford, et al. v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc., et al., 96-2913, ___ So.2d ___ (La. 9/9/97).

*1388 LEMMON and JOHNSON, JJ., would deny the writ.

KNOLL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conrad v. Lamarque Ford, Inc.
13 So. 3d 1154 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2009)
Eastin v. Entergy Corp.
710 So. 2d 835 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
702 So. 2d 1387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernard-v-thigpen-const-co-la-1997.