Bernard v. THIGPEN CONST. CO.

702 So. 2d 1387
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 21, 1997·No. 97-C-1877, 97-C-1893 and 97-C-1894·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

702 So.2d 1387 (1997)

Mona BERNARD, Wife of/and Larry Bernard, et al.
v.
THIGPEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, et al.

Nos. 97-C-1877, 97-C-1893 and 97-C-1894.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 21, 1997.

PER CURIAM.

The rulings of the lower courts are vacated and set aside. In Kenneth E. Ford, et al. v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc., et al., 96-2913, ___ So.2d ___ (La. 9/9/97), this court held that under certain circumstances, the existence of individual causation and liability issues as to each potential class member may so predominate over common issues that class certification is inappropriate. The trial court in this case erred in refusing to allow the introduction by defendants of evidence of causation. The certification of the class is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the trial court to conduct a new class certification hearing in light of this court's holding in Kenneth E. Ford, et al. v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc., et al., 96-2913, ___ So.2d ___ (La. 9/9/97).

*1388 LEMMON and JOHNSON, JJ., would deny the writ.

KNOLL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernard v. THIGPEN CONST. CO., 702 So. 2d 1387 (La. 1997).

702 So. 2d 1387 (Bernard v. THIGPEN CONST. CO.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conrad v. Lamarque Ford, Inc.
13 So. 3d 1154 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2009)
Eastin v. Entergy Corp.
710 So. 2d 835 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1998)