Bernard v. State

170 S.W.2d 231, 145 Tex. Crim. 502, 1943 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 801
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 31, 1943
DocketNo. 22464
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 170 S.W.2d 231 (Bernard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bernard v. State, 170 S.W.2d 231, 145 Tex. Crim. 502, 1943 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 801 (Tex. 1943).

Opinion

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for theft of turkeys, punishment assessed being a fine of $200.00.

The punishment for stealing turkey^ is confinement in the penitentiary, or by fine or imprisonment in the county jail. See Acts 1929, 41 Leg., page 247; Art. 1442b, Vernon’s Tex. [503]*503P. C., Vol. 3. The offense being one which may be punished by confinement in the penitentiary is a felony. Art. 47 P. C. This being true, it is necessary that sentence be pronounced against appellant even though the punishment assessed was only a fine. McFadden v. State, 108 Tex. Cr. R. 166, 200 S. W. 54; Nicholson v. State, 110 Tex. Cr. R. 112, 7 S. W. (2d) 1075; Johnson v. State, 126 Tex. Cr. R. 466, 72 S. W. (2d) 288.

The record before us does not show that sentence was ever pronounced against appellant in the absence of «which this court is without jurisdiction. Art. 769 C. C. P.; Wooldridge v. State, 61 Tex. Cr. R. 324, 135 S. W. 124. See other cases listed in Note 3 under Art. 769 Vernon’s Tex. C. C. P., Vol. 3.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Middleton v. State
476 S.W.2d 14 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 S.W.2d 231, 145 Tex. Crim. 502, 1943 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernard-v-state-texcrimapp-1943.