Bernard v. Scott

District Court, N.D. Illinois·Decided March 19, 2018·No. 3:15-cv-50277·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Eric E. Bernard, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vv. ) Case No: 15 C 50277 ) Roger Scott, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) Judge Frederick J. Kapala

ORDER Before the court is a report and recommendation (“R&R”) [77] by the magistrate judge that plaintiff’ s motion to dismiss [72] be granted and that defendant Erica Barnes be dismissed from the case with prejudice. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither party has offered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R of the magistrate judge, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the R&R, the court accepts the R&R and Erica Barnes is now terminated from the case with prejudice.

Date: 3/19/2018 ENTER:

FREDERICK J. a District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernard v. Scott, (N.D. Ill. 2018).

Bernard v. Scott (Bernard v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)