Bernard v. Ingersoll Milling Machine Co.

Supreme Court

Bernard v. Ingersoll Milling Machine Co.

484 U.S. 1042, 108 S. Ct. 774, 98 L. Ed. 2d 860, 56 U.S.L.W. 3500, 1988 A.M.C. 2399, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 491

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 25, 1988

DocketNo. 87-897

StatusPublished

Cited by139 cases

This text of 484 U.S. 1042 (Bernard v. Ingersoll Milling Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bernard v. Ingersoll Milling Machine Co., 484 U.S. 1042, 108 S. Ct. 774, 98 L. Ed. 2d 860, 56 U.S.L.W. 3500, 1988 A.M.C. 2399, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 491 (1988).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aqua-Marine Constructors, Inc., an Oregon Corporation v. Mike Banks, Individually and D/B/A Mike Banks Company, Polaris Insurance Company, Ltd., a Foreign Corporation, Polaris Insurance Company, Ltd., a Foreign Corporation, Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant-Third-Party v. Aqua-Marine Constructors, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Counter-Defendant, and Mike Banks, Individually and D/B/A Mike Banks Company, Cross-Defendants, and Latham Smith, Individually and D/B/A Smith Maritime the Tugboat Elizabeth II Pearcy Marine, Inc., a Colorado Corporation Jim Pearcy, an Individual the Tugboat Garnet Banks the Tugboat John Banks and Barge 242, Third-Party Cross-Defendants

110 F.3d 663 (Third Circuit, 1997)

Ambassador Factors v. Rhein-, Maas-, Und See- Schiffahrtskontor GmbH

105 F.3d 1397 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)

Great American Ins. Companies v. M/V ROMERAL

934 F. Supp. 744 (E.D. Louisiana, 1996)

A.I. Trade Finance, Inc. v. Centro Internationale Handelsbank AG

926 F. Supp. 378 (S.D. New York, 1996)

Cyrix Corporation, and Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc., and International Business MacHines Corporation v. Intel Corporation

77 F.3d 1381 (Federal Circuit, 1996)

ETS Gustave Brunet, S.A. v. M.V. "Nedlloyd Rosario"

929 F. Supp. 694 (S.D. New York, 1996)

Socha v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers

883 F. Supp. 790 (D. Rhode Island, 1995)

Konica Business Machines v. The Vessel Sea-Land Consumer

47 F.3d 314 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)

Riley v. TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES CORP.

872 F. Supp. 1454 (D. Maryland, 1995)

Neal Ex Rel. Kanter v. Casey

43 F.3d 48 (Third Circuit, 1994)

Baby Neal v. Casey

43 F.3d 48 (Third Circuit, 1994)

United Steelworkers of Americ. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.

32 F.3d 53 (Third Circuit, 1994)

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., (In No. 93-2008). Charles A. Thomas Darren Boop Robert W. Bower William D. Bridge James Clingan Neal B. Housner Jonathan L. Noaker Wayne D. Orner Gerald W. Ranck Harold E. Van Sickle, Jr. Richard A. Winter Eugene L. Witmer, Sr., (In No. 93-7613) v. North Star Steel Company

32 F.3d 53 (Third Circuit, 1994)

Richard M. McCostis Esq. v. Home Insurance Company of Indiana

31 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 1994)

American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Accu-Weather, Inc.

849 F. Supp. 233 (S.D. New York, 1994)

Crumpton v. Philip Morris, USA

845 F. Supp. 1421 (D. Colorado, 1994)

Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.

846 F. Supp. 522 (E.D. Texas, 1994)

Konrads Kalejs v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

10 F.3d 441 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

484 U.S. 1042, 108 S. Ct. 774, 98 L. Ed. 2d 860, 56 U.S.L.W. 3500, 1988 A.M.C. 2399, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernard-v-ingersoll-milling-machine-co-scotus-1988.