Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Bernard v. City of New York

Bernard v. City of New York

217 A.D.2d 419, 629 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7626
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 6, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 217 A.D.2d 419 (Bernard v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bernard v. City of New York, 217 A.D.2d 419, 629 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J.), entered January 30, 1995, which granted third-party plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against third-party defendant, and denied third-party defendant’s cross motion for an extension of time to answer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Third-party defendant was properly held in default for failure to demonstrate both that its defense had merit by the affidavit of someone with knowledge of the facts and a reasonable excuse for the delay (Stellato v Petrillo, 95 AD2d 704). Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Asch and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amanfo v. Olivo
224 A.D.2d 239 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 A.D.2d 419, 629 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernard-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1995.