Bernard v. Cafferty

77 Mass. 10
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1858·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Metcalf, J.

The court are of opinion that the ninth clause of the second section of the practice act (St. 1852, c. 312) does not require a plaintiff to set out, in his declaration, a copy of [11]*11any written instrument or any part thereof, except an instrument, or such part thereof, as he relies on as the ground of action ; the instrument on which his action is founded. In the present case, the ground of action is the alleged malicious prosecution of the plaintiff, without probable cause ; not the process or judgment which it may be necessary for him to prove in order to support his action. Demurrer overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernard v. Cafferty, 77 Mass. 10 (Mass. 1858).

77 Mass. 10 (Bernard v. Cafferty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Merriam
2 D. Haw. 428 (D. Hawaii, 1906)