Bernard Thomas Blackwell v. Charles Anderson, Warden
This text of 664 F.2d 1049 (Bernard Thomas Blackwell v. Charles Anderson, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner in this case appeals from a judgment denying his habeas corpus petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1976). Petitioner had been convicted of first degree murder and possessing a firearm during the commission of a felony. He seems to contend that at best the proofs presented by the government at his trial would serve to sustain a conviction for second degree murder.
Our review of this record, however, shows that there is more than ample evidence for the jury to find the following facts. On the date in question defendant went to the apartment of one Charles Thompson at 3 a. m. with three other men. Defendant kicked the door in. One of the other men, Pippin, shot Thompson three times. Defendant then told Pippin, the man who had shot Thompson, to make sure that Thompson was dead. Thereupon Pippin went back and shot Thompson three more times.
We believe that the jury could appropriately have found the necessary intent and participation in this murder to support the first degree murder conviction. Further, we find in this record no prosecutorial abuse, ineffective assistance of counsel, or erroneous ruling by the trial judge which served to deprive appellant of any federal constitutional right.
The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
664 F.2d 1049, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernard-thomas-blackwell-v-charles-anderson-warden-ca6-1981.