BERNARD RAMKELAWAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of BERNARD RAMKELAWAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA (BERNARD RAMKELAWAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
BERNARD RAMKELAWAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D18-501
[July 5, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Lynch, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 06-22759CF10A and 07-01951CF10A.
Bernard Ramkelawan, South Bay, pro se.
No brief filed for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The trial court’s denial of appellant’s “emergency motion to dismiss” shall be treated as a denial of a rule 3.850 motion. This appeal shall be redesignated as such and is affirmed.
GROSS, TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
BERNARD RAMKELAWAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernard-ramkelawan-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.