Bernard Mills v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Bernard Mills v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

23 F.3d 402, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18531, 1994 WL 179474

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 12, 1994

Docket93-6121

StatusPublished

This text of 23 F.3d 402 (Bernard Mills v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bernard Mills v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, 23 F.3d 402, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18531, 1994 WL 179474 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

23 F.3d 402
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Bernard MILLS, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent Appellee.

No. 93-6121.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Submitted June 15, 1993.
Decided May 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-92-238-2)

Bernard Mills, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Quentin Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Mills seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Mills v. Murray, No. CA-92-238-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 6, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

23 F.3d 402
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Bernard MILLS, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent Appellee.

No. 93-6121.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Submitted June 15, 1993.
Decided May 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-92-238-2)

Bernard Mills, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Quentin Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Mills seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Mills v. Murray, No. CA-92-238-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 6, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 F.3d 402, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18531, 1994 WL 179474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernard-mills-v-edward-w-murray-director-of-the-vi-ca4-1994.