Bernard McFadden v. Simon Major

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bernard McFadden v. Simon Major. Read the opinion of the Court — 439 F. App'x 283
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2012·No. 11-7642·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7642

BERNARD MCFADDEN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SIMON MAJOR, Director of SLRDC in his individual and personal capacity; D. SCOTT COOK, Dietician of SLRDC in his individual and personal capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01941-TMC)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard McFadden, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., Joel Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bernard McFadden appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

McFadden v. Major, No. 1:10-cv-01941-TMC (D.S.C. Nov. 22, 2011).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernard McFadden v. Simon Major, (4th Cir. 2012).

Bernard McFadden v. Simon Major (Bernard McFadden v. Simon Major) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related