Bernard Hawkins v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bernard Hawkins v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 706 F.3d 820
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided July 31, 2013·No. 11-1245·Published

Opinion

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

No. 11-1245

B ERNARD H AWKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v.

U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division. No. 2:10-cv-00016-JTM—James T. Moody, Judge.

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc .

D ECIDED JULY 31, 2013

Before E ASTERBROOK , Chief Judge, and P OSNER, K ANNE, R OVNER, W OOD , W ILLIAMS, S YKES, T INDER, and H AMILTON, Circuit Judges.Œ P OSNER, Circuit Judge. The petition to rehear this case (decided February 7, 2013, in an opinion reported at

Œ Circuit Judge Flaum took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. 2 No. 11-1245

706 F.3d 820) en banc is denied. Judges Rovner, Wood, Williams, and Hamilton voted to grant rehearing en banc. See also the supplemental panel opinion, issued today, which denies panel rehearing, together with a dissenting opinion by Judge Rovner.

R OVNER, Circuit Judge, with whom W OOD , W ILLIAMS, and H AMILTON, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc. I dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc for the same reasons set forth in my dissent from the denial of rehearing by the panel. I hereby incorporate by reference that dissent as a state- ment of the reasons why I believe the court should rehear this case en banc.

7-31-13

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernard Hawkins v. United States, (7th Cir. 2013).

Bernard Hawkins v. United States (Bernard Hawkins v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bernard Hawkins v. United States
706 F.3d 820 (Seventh Circuit, 2013)