Bernard E. Williams v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Bernard E. Williams v. United States

317 F.2d 545, 115 U.S. App. D.C. 134, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5751

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 28, 1963

Docket17349_1

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 317 F.2d 545 (Bernard E. Williams v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bernard E. Williams v. United States, 317 F.2d 545, 115 U.S. App. D.C. 134, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5751 (D.C. Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of conviction on one count of rape and one of rape and robbery which were joined in one indictment and tried together after denial of motion for severance. The two offenses occurred within a period of 12 days and at precisely the same place and under similar circumstances. Verdicts of guilty were returned but the death sentence was not fixed by the jury. Sentences of one to three years on the robbery count, and 10 to 30 years on each of the rape counts were imposed, to run concurrently.

Court appointed counsel has diligently briefed and ably argued this case but *546 our examination of the record and authorities in light of his contentions discloses no error which would warrant disturbing the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of conviction on one count of rape and one of rape and robbery which were joined in one indictment and tried together after denial of motion for severance. The two offenses occurred within a period of 12 days and at precisely the same place and under similar circumstances. Verdicts of guilty were returned but the death sentence was not fixed by the jury. Sentences of one to three years on the robbery count, and 10 to 30 years on each of the rape counts were imposed, to run concurrently.

Court appointed counsel has diligently briefed and ably argued this case but *546 our examination of the record and authorities in light of his contentions discloses no error which would warrant disturbing the judgment.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

317 F.2d 545, 115 U.S. App. D.C. 134, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernard-e-williams-v-united-states-cadc-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack