Bernam v. Hecht
162 N.E. 526, 248 N.Y. 565, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1367
This text of 162 N.E. 526 (Bernam v. Hecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bernam v. Hecht, 162 N.E. 526, 248 N.Y. 565, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1367 (N.Y. 1928).
Opinion
Order of Appellate Division reversed and that of Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. Questions certified answered in the negative. Held, that the plaintiffs have failed to show any facts justifying or tending to justify the joinder of an additional party.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound,- Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
162 N.E. 526, 248 N.Y. 565, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernam-v-hecht-ny-1928.