Bernal (Daniel) Vs. State
This text of 473 P.3d 1049 (Bernal (Daniel) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DANIEL RAYMOND BERNAL, No. 81921 Appellant, ' vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a judgrnent of conviction. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Scott N. Freeman, Judge. This court's preliminary review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court entered the judgment of conviction on August 5, 2020. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until September 24, 2020, well beyond the expiration of the 30- day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). "[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, this court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
AttZify;.-0 J. J. Stiglich cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Law Office of David R. Houston Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A .41130. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
473 P.3d 1049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bernal-daniel-vs-state-nev-2020.