Bermer v. Atlantic Dredging Co.

12 N.Y.S. 181, 65 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 359, 34 N.Y. St. Rep. 632, 58 Hun 359, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3386
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 10, 1890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pratt, J.

The, verdict established that the blasting done by defendant at Hell Gate shook the walls of plaintiff’s house inflicting injury. The court •charged that for such injury defendant was responsible, and refused to charge that to make defendant liable it must appear that the work was done in a negligent manner. We think the instruction was correct. If a desirable work cannot be done without shaking down a neighbor’s house, it would ■seem that the work should not be performed, unless the doer was prepared to make compensation for the injury inflicted. That rule seems best to promote ¡the general welfare. The public are not benefited by a change that inflicts an injury greater than the resulting benefit. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bermer v. Atlantic Dredging Co., 12 N.Y.S. 181, 65 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 359, 34 N.Y. St. Rep. 632, 58 Hun 359, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3386 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

12 N.Y.S. 181 (Bermer v. Atlantic Dredging Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morgan v. Bowes
17 N.Y.S. 22 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)